Connect with us

Arsenal news

Luka Milivojevic insists he had no doubts over penalty taking

Published

on


Crystal Palace captain Luka Milivojevic had no doubts over his penalty-taking ability after hitting two against Arsenal

  • Luka Milivojevic stepped up to convert two penalties and seal draw with Arsenal
  • The Crystal Palace captain missed a crucial spot-kick against Everton last week
  • Milivojevic says the missed penalty did not knock his confidence from the spot 

Mark Mann-bryans, Press Association Sport

Luka Milivojevic insists his confidence from the spot never waned as he scored two penalties to earn Crystal Palace a deserved draw against Arsenal on Sunday.

The Gunners looked on course to extend their winning run to 12 matches until the Eagles captain netted a late spot-kick to seal a 2-2 draw.

Milivojevic, who missed from 12 yards in defeat at Everton the previous week, had put Palace in front in first-half stoppage-time after Shkodran Mustafi fouled Cheikhou Kouyate.

Luka Milivojevic celebrates with a knee-slide as Crystal Palace take the lead over Arsenal

Luka Milivojevic celebrates with a knee-slide as Crystal Palace take the lead over Arsenal

Granit Xhaka’s superb free-kick and a controversial strike from Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang saw the Gunners turn things around after the interval, only for Xhaka to upend Wilfried Zaha with seven minutes left.

Milivojevic stepped up to beat Bernd Leno for a second time – his goals the first scored at home by Palace in the Premier League this season.

Despite missing at Everton when the game was goalless and seeing the Toffees go on to secure a 2-0 win, the Serbia international never intended on shirking the responsibility from the spot.

‘I’m very happy after this game,’ he told Palace TV.

Milivojevic scored the first goal from the penalty spot on the stroke of half-time

Milivojevic scored the first goal from the penalty spot on the stroke of half-time

Milivojevic scored the first goal from the penalty spot on the stroke of half-time

Bernd Leno of Arsenal failed to stop a penalty from Milivojevic just before half-time

Bernd Leno of Arsenal failed to stop a penalty from Milivojevic just before half-time

Bernd Leno of Arsenal failed to stop a penalty from Milivojevic just before half-time



<!–

Season at a glance

  • Premier League
  • Premier League
  • Championship
  • League One
  • League Two
  • Scottish Premiership
  • Scottish Div 1
  • Scottish Div 2
  • Scottish Div 3
  • Ligue 1
  • Serie A
  • La Liga
  • Bundesliga

‘It is not easy when you miss and straight away in the next game you have penalties but as I said, I had confidence to take them and that I was sure I was going to score.

‘I just decided where I wanted to go, where I want to shoot. I put pace into it and thank God I scored. Before the game I decided where I wanted to go.

‘The second one was very hard to take, it was in the 83rd minute and we were very tired because we pushed a lot.

‘I think I shot very accurately with the second one as well and I think from this game we deserved at least a point.

‘When you feel a lot of pressure on your back and then you score, your pressure goes down.

‘From the beginning of the season we played many good games and in the end dropped the points and lost the game.’

Unai Emery’s Arsenal had appeared to turn the game in their favour, equalising through Xhaka’s effort and going in front as Aubameyang turned home after Alexandre Lacazette had handled the ball.

The Gunners had won their previous 11 matches heading to Selhurst Park but have been starting games slowly in recent weeks.

He fired in his second penalty of the afternoon to bring Crystal Palace back on level terms

He fired in his second penalty of the afternoon to bring Crystal Palace back on level terms

He fired in his second penalty of the afternoon to bring Crystal Palace back on level terms

That pattern continued in south London and defender Rob Holding conceded after the game that Arsenal need to be at it from the start from now on.

‘We’ve come out in the second half in our past few matches and really turned on the style and scored some goals,’ he said.

‘We just need to start a bit faster and play how we do in the second half. That’s something to work on for the next game.

‘It’s the end of the winning run and we’re disappointed with that, but as long as we don’t lose, it’s one of them.

‘It was an entertaining game for the fans I suppose, but we’re disappointed not to keep that winning streak going.’

Milivojevic celebrates his second goal of the afternoon with the Crystal Palace fans

Milivojevic celebrates his second goal of the afternoon with the Crystal Palace fans

Milivojevic celebrates his second goal of the afternoon with the Crystal Palace fans



Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Arsenal news

Laurent Koscielny reprehensible behaviour has done Arsenal a massive favour

Published

on

By



Laurent Koscielny going on strike has done Arsenal a massive favour and forced the club to change its plans.

It really does appear that Unai Emery and the board had no intentions of bringing in a central defender. not going by the credible transfer reports we have been receiving.

It is fairly accepted that Dani Ceballos, Kieran Tierney, William Saliba, Everton Soares and Wilfried Zaha are the players the club are targeting.

Of those, only one is a central defender and he will not be available for a year.

Anyone watching the Arsenal mini-tour to the USA cannot fail to notice that the defence is still a shambles and that a central defender has to be the priority and it beggars belief that Arsenal has not clicked on to that.


Koscielny effectively going on strike leaves a huge gap at the back, he may not have played every game but he would have been significant throughout the season and he does need replacing.

If the club does not sign a central defender and goes with what we got then the consequences will be harsh and the fans will not forget, it would be negligence of the highest order.

Basically, the way I see it, if Koscielny would have stayed for another season the chances are no new central defender would have been brought in, that simply cannot be the case now.

So, in effect, the 33-year-old has done the club a massive favour even if they have not realised it yet.


Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Arsenal news

Photo: Man Utd stars dine out in Singapore

Published

on

By



After securing victory over Inter Milan in yesterday’s pre-season friendly, Manchester United’s players have been able to enjoy a bit of…

Click the headline to read the full story.





Source link

Continue Reading

Arsenal news

So what should Arsenal do about Aubz and Laca’s contract situations?

Published

on

By



Anyone Else Worried About This? by Dan Smith

While I don’t believe the seriousness of the rumours linking Aubameyang with a move away it did remind me about his current situation. Maybe gooners are distracted by transfer talk, or maybe we want to pretend it’s not happening, but our two best players have less than two years left on their deals. It means this time next year Auba and Lacazette can either run down their contracts or be sold for a cut price fee.

Essentially, we will be back in the Sanchez/Ramsey saga, one which we promised would never happen again.
In Raul Sanllehi ‘s own words, the recruitment team will be stricter with those with less than 24 months left on, unwilling to lose any more value on assets. So, by that criteria, if the Gabon and/or French striker chose not to negotiate we would have to sell now?

It would be a PR disaster to send one of our stars to a rival, but fear of criticism was the reason we preferred to lose Sanchez for nothing. The notion was having the Chilean for one campaign was better than any money we could have received. By the next January we were all taking about the 60 million we turned our backs on for 4 months work.

So, should we pay over the odds to keep the duo? Most gooners would say yes but how much stick have we got for doing exactly that for Ozil? The German has had supporters turn against him for his salary of 350,000 when he has zero resale value. Our forward line is 30 and 28 respectively and will be fully aware that someone the same age deemed not as important as them is the highest earner.

So, do we continue to write cheques North of 300,000 pound a week or (like Rambo) insist on a threshold? We either cash in now (fans will be unhappy), let them leave as free agents in the future (fans will be unhappy), or give them a raise (which upsets your wage structure). I was just wondering if anyone else was worried about this, and if so, what’s your preference?


My view is if Auba don’t say yes in the 2 weeks we have to sell, don’t we?

Dan Smith


Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

HTML Snippets Powered By : XYZScripts.com