Connect with us

Arsenal news

Why Someone Should Be Held Responsible And Sacked Immediately Over The Disastrous Denis Suarez Deal

Published

on


I’m so annoyed right now, it’s proving extremely difficult to compose a rational blog regarding the monumental fuck up regarding the loan deal involving Denis Suarez.

Denis Suarez, a £2m pound emergency panic loan, made in the absence of any cash was drafted in after protracted negotiations with Barcelona. The deal was done at the expense of all others and Arsenal decided to place all its eggs in one basket by focusing on the Spaniard.

In the months that followed, Denis Suarez played no more than a cameo role in Unai Emery’s first season, but at least he avoided the embarrassing end of campaign collapse that saw Arsenal bottle a top four position and roll to an average and disjointed Chelsea on the Europa league final.

We were informed on numerous occasions of the special working relationship and existence of mutual appreciation between Suarez and Emery but as time went on, this seemed to be the whispers of a man in a straight jacket talking to himself in the mirror.

Then Suarez, from a safe distance somewhere in sunny Spain revealed that he was less than 50% fit on his arrival at the Emirates, which begs the question, who signed him and why have they still got a job.

Denis Suarez told Cadena SER:

“I’m still recovering from the injury, I’m practically fully recovered,”

Adding:

“On the 16th day of arriving at Arsenal I was not even 50 per cent, it was a year to forget but also to learn.”

Now I’m going to go down the Raul Sanllehi route again because we were informed at the time that the new director of football personally involved himself in the deal.

I had doubts about this guy’s credibility before, but this revelation from Suarez confirms to me that the club is no safer under the new regime than it was under the dark lord Ivan Gazidis.

I’m looking for heads to roll, if it was Sanllehi, he needs to go. I’m an Emery supporter, but if he signed him knowing of his injury and ineligibility, he needs to go.

No excuses, no explanation, just an open door and a wave on the way out.

Arsenal have been the subject of ridicule over limited finances and loan deals but, this new level of incompetence is deeply worrying. The club is now openly referred to as ‘Farcenal’ and it appears for good reason.

Arsenal was well and truly shafted in this deal with the club virtually spending money on nothing.

Surely Suarez had a medical ?

If he wasn’t fit, why bother ?

Was he just bought in to motivate others ?

The whole business is appalling. Suarez played a full 90 minutes in a worthless promotional showpiece in the UAE and after that a handful of minutes here and there.

READ MORE:

Via Italy | Arsenal Reignite Interest For Inter Milan Star Winger Ivan Perisic Because Of This Reason

<img src="” class=”lazy lazy-hidden” data-lazy-type=”iframe” alt>

First Summer Signing Incoming | Arsenal Close To Securing Their First Target After Agreeing Deal With German Wonderkid

<img src="” class=”lazy lazy-hidden” data-lazy-type=”iframe” alt>

Unai Emery Eyes £49 Million Rated Serie A Duo To Bolster Arsenal’s Lousy Defense

<img src="” class=”lazy lazy-hidden” data-lazy-type=”iframe” alt>

If you are an Arsenal fan and you aren’t spitting bile at this news or wanting to put Raul Sanllehi in the boot of your car so that you can drive fast over speed bumps, there’s something wrong.

How can fans possibly trust the club in the hands of these witless wonders, who lurch from crisis to crisis without a care in the world.

If Stan Kroenke believes in Raul Sanllehi, he’s a bigger idiot than I thought he was.

Stay Tuned to know more!

#wpdevar_comment_1 span,#wpdevar_comment_1 iframewidth:100% !important;

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Arsenal news

Laurent Koscielny reprehensible behaviour has done Arsenal a massive favour

Published

on

By



Laurent Koscielny going on strike has done Arsenal a massive favour and forced the club to change its plans.

It really does appear that Unai Emery and the board had no intentions of bringing in a central defender. not going by the credible transfer reports we have been receiving.

It is fairly accepted that Dani Ceballos, Kieran Tierney, William Saliba, Everton Soares and Wilfried Zaha are the players the club are targeting.

Of those, only one is a central defender and he will not be available for a year.

Anyone watching the Arsenal mini-tour to the USA cannot fail to notice that the defence is still a shambles and that a central defender has to be the priority and it beggars belief that Arsenal has not clicked on to that.


Koscielny effectively going on strike leaves a huge gap at the back, he may not have played every game but he would have been significant throughout the season and he does need replacing.

If the club does not sign a central defender and goes with what we got then the consequences will be harsh and the fans will not forget, it would be negligence of the highest order.

Basically, the way I see it, if Koscielny would have stayed for another season the chances are no new central defender would have been brought in, that simply cannot be the case now.

So, in effect, the 33-year-old has done the club a massive favour even if they have not realised it yet.


Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Arsenal news

Photo: Man Utd stars dine out in Singapore

Published

on

By



After securing victory over Inter Milan in yesterday’s pre-season friendly, Manchester United’s players have been able to enjoy a bit of…

Click the headline to read the full story.





Source link

Continue Reading

Arsenal news

So what should Arsenal do about Aubz and Laca’s contract situations?

Published

on

By



Anyone Else Worried About This? by Dan Smith

While I don’t believe the seriousness of the rumours linking Aubameyang with a move away it did remind me about his current situation. Maybe gooners are distracted by transfer talk, or maybe we want to pretend it’s not happening, but our two best players have less than two years left on their deals. It means this time next year Auba and Lacazette can either run down their contracts or be sold for a cut price fee.

Essentially, we will be back in the Sanchez/Ramsey saga, one which we promised would never happen again.
In Raul Sanllehi ‘s own words, the recruitment team will be stricter with those with less than 24 months left on, unwilling to lose any more value on assets. So, by that criteria, if the Gabon and/or French striker chose not to negotiate we would have to sell now?

It would be a PR disaster to send one of our stars to a rival, but fear of criticism was the reason we preferred to lose Sanchez for nothing. The notion was having the Chilean for one campaign was better than any money we could have received. By the next January we were all taking about the 60 million we turned our backs on for 4 months work.

So, should we pay over the odds to keep the duo? Most gooners would say yes but how much stick have we got for doing exactly that for Ozil? The German has had supporters turn against him for his salary of 350,000 when he has zero resale value. Our forward line is 30 and 28 respectively and will be fully aware that someone the same age deemed not as important as them is the highest earner.

So, do we continue to write cheques North of 300,000 pound a week or (like Rambo) insist on a threshold? We either cash in now (fans will be unhappy), let them leave as free agents in the future (fans will be unhappy), or give them a raise (which upsets your wage structure). I was just wondering if anyone else was worried about this, and if so, what’s your preference?


My view is if Auba don’t say yes in the 2 weeks we have to sell, don’t we?

Dan Smith


Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

HTML Snippets Powered By : XYZScripts.com